ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy, Peter G. Neumann, moderator
Pitfalls of a Fail-Safe Mail Protocol?
Some Ruminations on an Ideal Defense System
SDI, feasibility is irrelevant
To: RISKS@SRI-CSLA.ARPA After reading the case of the double posting of hundreds of millions of dollars in RISKS-1.11, some of you apparently experienced the multiple posting of RISKS-1.13 -- all original mailings time-stamped Sat 14 Sep 85 23:43:07-PDT, all complete, and all identical. Brint Cooper, for example, received THREE identical copies at various time intervals. Received: from brl-aos.arpa by TGR.BRL.ARPA id aa20274; 15 Sep 85 3:23 EDT Received: from sri-csl.arpa by AOS.BRL.ARPA id a017885; 15 Sep 85 3:18 EDT Received: from brl-aos.arpa by TGR.BRL.ARPA id a021160; 15 Sep 85 4:47 EDT Received: from sri-csl.arpa by AOS.BRL.ARPA id a018065; 15 Sep 85 4:35 EDT Received: from brl-aos.arpa by TGR.BRL.ARPA id a022055; 15 Sep 85 6:31 EDT Received: from sri-csl.arpa by AOS.BRL.ARPA id a018257; 15 Sep 85 6:17 EDT The new

Report problems with the web pages to the maintainer