ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy, Peter G. Neumann, moderator
``Student plan marred by computer mistake'' Immigration Chief Proposes National Computer Screen Big Brother is Hallucinating Study finds ``pedal misapplication'' to blame for Audi surges Computer Crime and Social Risks Reducing risks of cost overruns/project failures Re: New Yorker Article on radiation risks Computerized Translations Info on RISKS (comp.risks)
``Student plan marred by computer mistake''The complete text of an article in the Boston Globe, 6/23/89. pp. 13,83 (reproduced without permission) Student plan marred by computer mistake by Diego Ribadeneira, Globe Staff In a major glitch in the new Boston school student assignment plan, a computer tape containing the names of nearly 900 students entering kindergarten this fall was lost, leaving parents unsure if their children will be able to attend their preferred schools. The snafu, discovered earlier this week, also hurts the credibility of the plan, which some critics had said was being implemented too rapidly. Some students who have already received their assignments for next year may not have gotten their top choices had the tape with the 900 applicants been properly processed, school officials said. Superintendent Laval S. Wilson said the department has not yet determined how it will remedy the problem. He said it may conduct the assignment process for kindergarten students all over again. The error occurred, according to school officials, because the lost tape had been used to test the accuracy of a program developed to assign schools to students under the new plan. The tape was not returned to be used in the computer run to assign students to schools. ``Inadvertently this tape was not merged with the other tapes...,'' said Catherine Ellison, senior officer for implementation for the Boston School Department. The lost tape contained the names of 887 children, the majority of whom will be entering kindergarten. Since the mistake was discovered, school officials have manually been able to match 344 of the children on the misplaced tape with one of their school choices. Under the plan, called controlled choice, the city is divided into three geographic zones. Parents were asked to list five choices for schools within their zone. The plan will being this fall for students entering kindergarten, first grade and sixth grade. All remaining grades would fall under the new plan in the fall of 1990. School officials had advised parents affected by the new plan to submit their applications by May 18, the first deadline for choosing a school, to have a better chance of getting their top choices. The officials acknowledged yesterday that the remaining 543 students on the misplaced tape may not get one of their preferred schools, partly as a result of the mistake. ``We will be looking at the remaining applicants to determine how well we can honor the requests,'' Ellison said. ``We will do as much as we can with the best interests of the parents in mind. I won't sit here and promise something I cannot deliver. We hope to attempt to honor one of the parents choices.'' Kathy Satut listed the New Agassiz School in Jamaica Plain as her first choice. ``I called up Wednesday and that's when they told me they had lost the tape.'' Satut said. ``I couldn't believe they had done that. Now I don't know what's going to happen. Am I going to be penalized for their mistake? What was the point of trying to get the application in on time. I think they should all be fired. I'm very, very upset.'' School officials said they are trying to insure that the percentage of students from the misplaced tape who get their first choice will be about the same as that for the students assigned schools from the first computer run. They said they hope to complete assignments for kindergarten students by the weekend. News of the error angered some school observers who said it comes at a time when various reforms are being undertaken in an effort to lure new students to the system. ``It's pretty outrageous,'' said Paula Georges, executive director of the Citywide Education Coalition. ``It undermines the credibility of the plan.'' [End of Text] [The most obvious implication of this incident is the importance of having a backup. And why oh why weren't they using a *copy* of the data to do their testing?!? The article merely hints at some intriguing characteristics of the Boston Schools' DP department. What disturbs me about this is that the plan is an important step in the troubled recent history of the Boston schools towards equitable access to various resources within the schools, by allowing parents to make an informed choice for their child as to which school to attend. This ``snafu'' has created the perception of arbitrary school assignments. Further, I suspect the complicated nature of giving the maximum number of students one of five top choices involves so many permutations that computer processing is essential to proceeding with the plan; as the article reveals, the ``credibility'' of both the plan, and most likely the role of computer processing, has now been called into serious doubt.]
Immigration Chief Proposes National Computer Screen
Friday June 23 N Y Times, p. A10:
By Roberto Suro, special to the NYT
LA JOLLA, CA, June 22 -- The Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization,
Alan C. Nelson, today proposed a nationwide computer system to verify the
identities of all job applicants in order to halt the widspread use of
fraudulent documents by illegal aliens seeking jobs.
Mr Nelson also suggested standardized identity cards for immigrants
so as to get fuller compliance with a 1986 law prohibiting employment of
illegal aliens.
Creating a national identity card and other ways of checking legal
status or identity have been repeatedly suggested in Congress as tools in
fighting unlawful immigration, but have also been consistently rejected
as potential infringements on civil liberties.
[15 column-inches deleted]
The national computerized database on everybody is one bad idea that
simply refuses to stay dead, no matter how many times we drive a stake
through its heart---if the INS ("Search warrants? We don't need no
stinking search warrants!") didn't resurrect it, the drug czar or the
FBI would. "Eternal vigilance ...". On the other hand, it appears to
me that most informed citizens by now understand the risks involved:
computer professionals no longer have to fight this battle alone.
The identity-card stuff I suppose belongs in talk.politics.misc: I won't
go into it here.
Chris chrisj@cup.portal.com sun!cup.portal.com!chrisj
(Christopher T. Jewell) chrisj@netcom.uucp apple!netcom!chrisj
Big Brother is Hallucinating
I've seen a fair number of articles in the press lately warning people about
how sophisticated advertisers are getting in keeping databases and targetting
particular groups. I wonder if any of their authors has been getting the
targetted junk mail I have.
Oh sure, I get junk mail targetted towards Mazda owners, because I bought one
recently - but I get equally large amounts of junk mail for Camry owners, that
being the car I sold when I bought the Mazda. Some of my junk mail is targetted
to childless single mid-twenties women; then again, the same week brought me
mail that confidently announced that the coupons inside were specifically
targetted towards "growing families like mine, with young children" and mail
that confidently announced that I had now reached "an interesting age" (from
context, they meant I was over 40) and my children were all grown! Not to
mention the advertisements that begin "Men like you..."
I understand why they think I own a Toyota; I have a vague concept that my
growing family was a guess based on the date of my marriage certificate, which
definitely made its way into databases. I am at a loss to explain how anybody
became certain that I was over 40, or that I was male. I also wonder why (and
how) people manage to keep such careful track of car purchases but not sales,
marriage but not divorce... My mother, who has been dead nearly 5 years, has
reached retirement age in the databases that are preserving her memory for the
advertisers of America.
All in all, I don't think I'll worry about Big Brother watching me in order to
sell things to me.
Elizabeth Zwicky
Study finds ``pedal misapplication'' to blame for Audi surgesHere are excerpts from IEEE INSTITUTE, July 1989, p. 8: ``Study finds `pedal misapplication' to blame for Audi surges'' by Karen Fitzgerald The Audi 5000 has largely been vindicated in claims over the last four years of sudden, out-of-control acceleration, but a U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) study released in March also cautioned that pedal design and minor engine acceleration may have caused drivers to apply their foot to the accelerator instead of the brake. ... The study, ``An Examination of Sudden Acceleration,'' explored ... electromagnetic and radio frequency interference and malfunctions in cruise control, electronic idle-speed control systems, computer-controlled fuel injection systems, transmissions, and brakes. The investigators could find no mechanism --- besides actuation of the gas pedal --- that would open the throttle sufficiently to accelerate any of the cars studied at full power. However, there was evidence of minor surges of about three-tenths of the Earth's gravity for 2 seconds caused by electronic faults in the idle stabilizer systems of the Audi 5000 ... the surge could startle a driver enough to accidentally push the accelerator instead of the brake, the study found ... Moreover, the travel of the pedals and their height off the floor make it possible for engine torque to overtake brake torque when the pedals are applied simultaneously ... [ more about this, including a graph indicating unusually problematic placement of pedals in the Audi ]. The NHTSA took pains to call the problem ``pedal misapplication'' rather than ``driver error,'' as Audi first characterized the problem. ... ``Driver error may imply carelessness or wilfulness in failing to operate a car properly,'' said an NHTSA press release announcing the study. ``...(sudden acceleration) could happen to even the most attentive driver who inadvertantly selects the wrong pedal and continues to do so unwittingly.'' - Jon Jacky, University of Washington
Computer Crime and Social RisksSocial Comment: Are computer criminals, and is computer crime, treated differently than other crimes? RISKS DIGEST 8.85 (28 June) carried two separate stories on hackers, their motives, and the results of their "activities". In one case, a teenager managed to crack the code of an Air Force satellite and was able to read confidential information of at least 200 companies: "He hoped to use his know-how to persuade the companies to hire him as a computer security consultant, police said." The second article reported that "Firms in the City of London are buying the silence of hackers who break into their computers and steal millions of pounds." I have personal knowledge of similar incidents of both types: o One hacker, very notorious to telecommunications security people, was finally apprehended, and some of the on-line evidence in his personal accounts showed that he had planned to use his cracking expertise to get a job in the computer industry. o I have never heard of any payoffs, such as are reported in the second article--but it is well known among security and legal consultants that companies will often drop a hacker case because of fear of publicity. In fact, some of the security experts have been "turned to the dark side of hacking": frustrated by their own company's refusal to crack down on lawbreaking, they have become phone phreaks and crackers themselves. There is a persistent piece of folklore that criminals in nonviolent crimes are often hired as consultants by the industries or governments they victimized. I can't remember the source exactly--but I remember a report a few years back from some U.S. Government enforcement agency that such things are very rare; in fact, the incidents of such hiring are all well documented as special cases. But in computer crime it appears to be a norm that criminal activity will go unpunished, and might even be rewarded. If the social controls aren't in step with legal controls, then the best laws and enforcement systems are worthless. Companies and governments publicly decry cracking of all types: they often state that the public should be educated that breaking into telecommunications circuits (computers or otherwise) is a crime. Yet these same companies/agencies refuse to enforce existing laws--and some crackers have been hired as consultants or paid off. I don't pretend to have a good answer to this problem. Perhaps the "social" definition of computer crime needs to be changed; maybe we're dealing with a new and different kind of social behavior and the rules must be examined. Personally I favor more enforcement of existing laws, perhaps backed up with a new law that would not allow companies/agencies to drop charges once an arrest was made (a frequent occurrence). However, something needs to be done: as long as this social/legal dichotomy exists, no progress (or protection) exists for the socially responsible hacker and computer user.
Re: New Yorker Article on radiation risks (RISKS 8.82)
Tue, 27 Jun 89 13:37:01 -0700
The third part in the series is on radiation and alleged health problems
associated with VDTs. It is worth reading -- it was sufficiently detailed to
give a former "they should have accounted for job stress" skeptic (me) reason
to wonder.
Several points taken from the series (as recalled and interpreted by me):
1) consider *magnetic* fields, not just *electrical* fields
(easier to shield against electrical fields)
2) The strength and range of magnetic
fields depends on geometry and current -- the low-voltage
distribution lines in your back yard may emit just as
strong a magnetic field as the high voltage lines through
some farmer's fields. Though magnetic fields fall off
rapidly with distance, fields from large "coils" extend
farther than fields from small "coils" (that is, house-
hold appliances are much smaller than power distribution
systems, and thus their magnetic fields are of different
shape and size).
3) consider not just VDT operators, but also people sitting
around the VDT operators (there's the horizontal deflection
coil which emits a 10s of KHz sawtooth, and the vertical
deflection which emits a 50-100 Hz sawtooth. The strong
portions of those fields may not extend directly to the front
of the VDT).
4) be careful, in general, when people quote "average" figures
at you; the repetitive peak power is also an important figure.
The frequency spectrum is also interesting -- harmonic effects
have been observed.
5) There have been studies (on magnetic fields in general).
Effects have been observed, both statistically (leukemia stats)
and experimentally (abnormal development of fetal chickens and
mice). The mechanism, if any, is unknown.
*Interactions with the ambient (i.e., earth's) magnetic field
have been observed* -- this affects repeatability of experiments
if not controlled for.
David
Computerized Translations
Will Martin
Thu, 22 Jun 89 15:54:04 CDT
Thanks to Bhota San for the posting on the Canadian computer-translation
item. This reminded me of something I had just seen in a recent paper,
and which struck me as odd at the time. However, since I didn't know
what the curent state-of-the-art was in computerized translation, I
didn't realize at the time that this precis of a US Army Request for
Proposal represented some really pie-in-the-sky hopes for a fantastic
level of AI in automated translation! Here is the item, from the
"CBD Watch" column [CBD = Commerce Business Daily] on page 24 in the
June 5, 1989 issue of Federal Computer Week:
Army. Software for language translation. Software must be capable of
translating from English to German, Spanish, French, Italian, Japanese, Korean,
Chinese and Portugese. It must provide idiomatic, verbatim translation of such
documents as military specs, international legal agreements, correspondence,
reports, studies and military briefings on doctrine, combat developments,
training and materials. It must be MS-DOS compatible and capable of translating
military terms and syntax. Contact Barbara Smith, TRADOC Contracting Activity,
Building 1748, Fort Eustis, VA 23604-5538, (804) 878-4053. ***End of item***
Hmmm... So these people expect this to run on a PC, too... (note the "MS-DOS"
reference...) "TRADOC" is the Training and Doctrine Command, by the way. I can
see why they would want to be able to translate stuff for the training of
allied personnel. However, based on the info in the previous posting, it sure
seems unlikely they are going to get what they want! Also, the RISKS
implications of this are rather stupendous. To expect software to translate
both military jargon, circumlocution, and tortured governmentese prose, and at
the same time handle the diplomatic nuances of "international legal agreements"
is a bit much, I think... Most multi-lingual humans would have difficulty
doing that.
Will Martin
Report problems with the web pages to the maintainer